EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Shapley and superShapley aggregation emerging from consensus dynamics in the multicriteria Choquet framework

Silvia Bortot (), Ricardo Alberto Marques Pereira () and Anastasia Stamatopoulou ()
Additional contact information
Silvia Bortot: University of Trento
Ricardo Alberto Marques Pereira: University of Trento
Anastasia Stamatopoulou: University of Trento

Decisions in Economics and Finance, 2020, vol. 43, issue 2, No 10, 583-611

Abstract: Abstract We investigate a negotiation model for the progressive aggregation of interacting multicriteria evaluations. The model is based on a network of interacting criteria and combines the Choquet aggregation framework with the classical DeGroot’s model of consensus linear dynamics. We consider a set $$N = \{ 1,\ldots ,n \}$$ N = { 1 , … , n } of interacting criteria whose single evaluations are expressed in some domain $${\mathbb {D}}\subseteq {\mathbb {R}}$$ D ⊆ R . The pairwise interaction among the criteria is described by a complete graph with edge values in the open unit interval. In the Choquet framework, the interacting network structure is the basis for the construction of a consensus capacity $$\mu $$ μ , whose Shapley indices are proportional to the average degree of interaction between criterion $$i \in N $$ i ∈ N and the remaining criteria $$j \ne i \in N $$ j ≠ i ∈ N . We discuss three types of linear consensus dynamics, each of which represents a progressive aggregation process towards a consensual multicriteria evaluation corresponding to some form of mean of the original multicriteria evaluations. All three models refer significantly to the notion of multicriteria context evaluation. In one model, the progressive aggregation converges simply to the plain mean of the original multicriteria evaluations, while another model converges to the Shapley mean of those original multicriteria evaluations. The third model, instead, converges to an emphasized form of Shapley mean, which we call superShapley mean. The interesting relation between Shapley and superShapley aggregation is investigated.

Keywords: Multicriteria decision making; Negotiation and consensus reaching; Linear dynamical models; Network interaction; Choquet capacities; Möbius transforms; Shapley and superShapley means; C02; C70-71; D60-61 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10203-020-00282-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:decfin:v:43:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10203-020-00282-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/10203/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10203-020-00282-y

Access Statistics for this article

Decisions in Economics and Finance is currently edited by Paolo Ghirardato

More articles in Decisions in Economics and Finance from Springer, Associazione per la Matematica
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:decfin:v:43:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10203-020-00282-y