MOdified NARanjo Causality Scale for ICSRs (MONARCSi): A Decision Support Tool for Safety Scientists

Shaun Comfort (), Darren Dorrell, Shawman Meireis and Jennifer Fine
Additional contact information
Shaun Comfort: Genentech, Inc-A Member of the Roche Group
Darren Dorrell: Genentech, Inc-A Member of the Roche Group
Shawman Meireis: Genentech, Inc-A Member of the Roche Group
Jennifer Fine: Genentech, Inc-A Member of the Roche Group

Drug Safety, 2018, vol. 41, issue 11, No 8, 1073-1085

Abstract: Abstract Introduction Within the field of Pharmacovigilance, the most common approaches for assessing causality between a report of a drug and a corresponding adverse event are clinical judgment, probabilistic methods and algorithms. Although multiple methods using these three approaches have been proposed, there is currently no universally accepted method for assessing drug-event causality in ICSRs and variability in drug-event causality assessments is well documented. Objective This study describes the development and validation of an Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR) Causality Decision Support Tool to assist Safety Professionals (SPs) performing causality assessments. Methods Roche developed this model with nine drug-event pair features capturing important aspects of Naranjo’s scoring system, selected Bradford–Hill criteria, and internal Roche safety practices. Each of the features was weighted based on individual safety professional (n = 65) assessments of the importance of that feature when assessing causality, using an ordinal weighting scale (0 = no importance, 4 = very high importance). The mean and associated standard deviation for each feature weight was calculated and were used as inputs to a fitted logistic equation, which calculated the probability of a causal relationship between the drug and adverse event. Model training, validation, and testing were conducted by comparing MONARCSi causality classifications to previous company causality assessments for 978 randomly selected, clinical trial drug-event pairs based on their respective features and weights. Results The final model test, a two-by-two comparison of the results, showed substantial agreement (Gwet Kappa = 0.77) between MONARCSi and Roche safety professionals’ assessments of causality, using global introspection. The model exhibited moderate sensitivity (65%) and high specificity (93%), high positive and negative predictive values (79 and 88%, respectively), and an F1 score of 71%. Conclusion Analysis suggests that the MONARCSi model could potentially be a useful decision support tool to assist pharmacovigilance safety professionals when evaluating drug-event causality in a consistent and documentable manner.

Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-018-0690-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:11:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0690-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/adis/journal/40264

DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0690-y

Access Statistics for this article

Drug Safety is currently edited by Nitin Joshi

More articles in Drug Safety from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().