Use of a Patient-Friendly Terms List in the Adverse Drug Reaction Report Form: A Database Study
Sieta T. de Vries,
Judy Harrison,
Patrick Revelle,
Alicia Ptaszynska-Neophytou,
Anna Radecka,
Gowthamei Ragunathan,
Phil Tregunno,
Petra Denig and
Peter G. M. Mol ()
Additional contact information
Sieta T. de Vries: University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
Judy Harrison: MedDRA® Maintenance and Support Services Organization
Patrick Revelle: MedDRA® Maintenance and Support Services Organization
Alicia Ptaszynska-Neophytou: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
Anna Radecka: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
Gowthamei Ragunathan: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
Phil Tregunno: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
Petra Denig: University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
Peter G. M. Mol: University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
Drug Safety, 2019, vol. 42, issue 7, No 6, 886 pages
Abstract:
Abstract Introduction When reporting adverse drug reactions to pharmacovigilance centres, patients and consumers can describe adverse drug reactions experienced in free-text format. Recently, a patient-friendly adverse drug reaction terms list was introduced in the adverse drug reaction report form in the UK to facilitate this reporting. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the actual use of the patient-friendly terms list in the adverse drug reaction report form and its association with the type of adverse drug reactions reported. Methods We conducted a database study in which we reviewed the list’s use for all reported adverse drug reactions by patients and consumers to the pharmacovigilance centre in the UK via the online report form between August and September 2017. Descriptive statistics were used. In addition, for adverse drug reactions reported more than 20 times, Chi-squared tests were used to test for differences in the number of reports in which the patient-friendly terms list was used and those in which the adverse drug reaction was entered as free text. Results In total, 888 reports were received. In 185 reports (21%), the patient-friendly terms list was used to enter an adverse drug reaction. In total, the reports contained 3227 adverse drug reactions. Nausea, headache, diarrhoea, dizziness, insomnia, anxiety, depression, fatigue, tiredness, vomiting, appetite lost, joint pain, chest pain, constipation and pain were reported more than 20 times. Five of these adverse drug reactions (i.e. nausea, diarrhoea, dizziness, insomnia and constipation) were reported significantly more often in reports where the adverse drug reactions were selected from the patient-friendly terms list. Conclusions Most people chose to describe adverse drug reactions in their own words rather than selecting adverse drug reactions from a patient-friendly terms list. Although the patient-friendly terms list may be a useful feature for some patients or for some adverse drug reactions, it should not replace the option for patients to describe adverse drug reactions in their own words.
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-019-00800-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-019-00800-x
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/adis/journal/40264
DOI: 10.1007/s40264-019-00800-x
Access Statistics for this article
Drug Safety is currently edited by Nitin Joshi
More articles in Drug Safety from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().