Prenatal Exposure to Macrolides and Risk of Congenital Malformations: A Meta-Analysis

Narmeen Mallah, Hamid Reza Tohidinik, Mahyar Etminan, Adolfo Figueiras and Bahi Takkouche ()
Additional contact information
Narmeen Mallah: University of Santiago de Compostela
Hamid Reza Tohidinik: University of Santiago de Compostela
Mahyar Etminan: University of British Columbia
Adolfo Figueiras: University of Santiago de Compostela
Bahi Takkouche: University of Santiago de Compostela

Drug Safety, 2020, vol. 43, issue 3, No 2, 221 pages

Abstract: Abstract Introduction Macrolides are widely used during pregnancy; however, their fetal safety remains uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the relation between prenatal exposure to macrolides and occurrence of congenital malformations. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other databases until June 12, 2019. We assessed the quality of the studies and checked for heterogeneity and publication bias. We performed three different analyses and compared the effect of macrolides with each of the following unexposed populations: Group 1: babies unexposed to any medicine before birth, Group 2: babies exposed to non-macrolide antibiotics/non-teratogens, and Group 3: mixed population of the first and second comparators. Results A weak association between macrolides and congenital malformation of any type was observed when macrolides were compared with the mixed population (ORgroup 3 1.06 [95% CI 1.01–1.10]). Subgroup analysis showed that this weak association is restricted to fetus exposure in the first trimester of pregnancy (OR 1.06 [95% CI 1.01–1.11]) and to cohort studies (OR 1.07 [95% CI 1.02–1.13]). Digestive system malformations were found to be slightly associated with prenatal exposure to macrolides (ORgroup 3 1.14 [95% CI 1.02–1.26]). The musculoskeletal system was also found to be potentially affected (ORgroup 2 1.21 [95% CI 1.08–1.35] and ORgroup 3 1.15 [95% CI 1.05–1.26]). European studies showed a slightly stronger association than American studies in these two comparisons. Conclusions Our study suggests a weak association between prenatal use of macrolides and congenital malformations, limited to exposure in early pregnancy, and musculoskeletal and digestive systems. In addition to studies with a larger control of confounding, risk–benefit research is needed to determine the usefulness of macrolides during pregnancy.

Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-019-00884-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:43:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s40264-019-00884-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/adis/journal/40264

DOI: 10.1007/s40264-019-00884-5

Access Statistics for this article

Drug Safety is currently edited by Nitin Joshi

More articles in Drug Safety from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().