EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Lessons Learned on Observed-to-Expected Analysis Using Spontaneous Reports During Mass Vaccination

María Gordillo-Marañón (), Gianmario Candore, Karin Hedenmalm, Kate Browne, Robert Flynn, Loris Piccolo, Aniello Santoro, Cosimo Zaccaria and Xavier Kurz
Additional contact information
María Gordillo-Marañón: European Medicines Agency
Gianmario Candore: Bayer AG
Karin Hedenmalm: European Medicines Agency
Kate Browne: European Medicines Agency
Robert Flynn: European Medicines Agency
Loris Piccolo: European Medicines Agency
Aniello Santoro: European Medicines Agency
Cosimo Zaccaria: European Medicines Agency
Xavier Kurz: European Medicines Agency

Drug Safety, 2024, vol. 47, issue 7, No 2, 607-615

Abstract: Abstract During the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, observed-to-expected analysis was used by the European Medicines Agency to contextualise data from spontaneous reports to generate real-time evidence on emerging safety concerns that may impact the benefit-risk profile of COVID-19 vaccines. Observed-to-expected analysis compares the number of cases spontaneously reported for an event of interest after vaccination (‘observed’) to the ‘expected’ number of cases anticipated to occur in the same number of individuals had they not been vaccinated. Observed-to-expected analysis is a robust methodology that relies on several assumptions that have been described in regulatory guidelines and scientific literature. The use of observed-to-expected analysis to support the safety monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines has provided valuable insights and lessons on its design and interpretability, which could prove to be beneficial in future analyses. When undertaking an observed-to-expected analysis within the context of safety monitoring, several aspects need attention. In particular, we emphasise the importance of stratified and harmonised data collection both for vaccine exposure and spontaneous reporting data, the need for alignment between coding dictionaries and the crucial role of accurate background incidence rates for adverse events of special interest. While these considerations and recommendations were determined in the context of the COVID-19 mass vaccination setting, they are generalisable in principle.

Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-024-01422-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01422-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/adis/journal/40264

DOI: 10.1007/s40264-024-01422-8

Access Statistics for this article

Drug Safety is currently edited by Nitin Joshi

More articles in Drug Safety from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01422-8