Disproportionality Analysis and Characterisation of Medication Errors in EudraVigilance: Exploring Findings on Sexes and Age Groups

Victor Pera (), Jan A. Kors (), Erik M. Mulligen (), Marcel Wilde (), Peter R. Rijnbeek () and Katia M. C. Verhamme ()
Additional contact information
Victor Pera: Erasmus University Medical Center
Jan A. Kors: Erasmus University Medical Center
Erik M. Mulligen: Erasmus University Medical Center
Marcel Wilde: Erasmus University Medical Center
Peter R. Rijnbeek: Erasmus University Medical Center
Katia M. C. Verhamme: Ghent University

Drug Safety, 2025, vol. 48, issue 1, No 5, 59-74

Abstract: Abstract Background While medication errors (MEs) have been studied in the European Medicines Agency’s EudraVigilance, extensive characterisation and signal detection based on sexes and age groups have not been attempted. Objectives The aim of this study was to characterise all ME-related individual case safety reports in EudraVigilance and explore notable signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) among sexes and age groups for the 30 most frequently reported drugs. Methods Individual case safety reports were used from EudraVigilance reported between 2002 and 2021. An ME was defined as any Preferred Term from the narrow Standardised Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities® Query. Signals of disproportionate reporting were selected based on a lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval ≥ 1 of the reporting odds ratio, and at least 3 individual case safety reports. Analysed subgroups were female individuals, male individuals, and age groups 0–1 month, 2 months to 2 years, 3–11 years, 12–17 years, 18–64 years, 65–85 years, and >85 years. Heatmaps were utilised as a visual aid to identify striking SDRs. Results Of the 9,662,345 EudraVigilance reports, 267,262 (2.8%) contained at least one ME, with a total of 300,324 MEs, for 429,554 drugs. The most reported ME was “Inappropriate schedule of product administration” (52,646; 17.5%), followed by “Incorrect dose administered” (32,379; 10.8%) and “Wrong technique in product usage process” (26,831; 8.9%). Individual case safety reports with MEs were most frequently related to female individuals (148,009; 55.4%), most often submitted by healthcare professionals (155,711; 58.3%), originated predominantly from the USA (98,716; 36.9%), followed by France (26,678; 10.0%), and showed a median reported age of 50 years (interquartile range: 26–68). Most ME individual case safety reports (158,991; 59.5%) were associated with a serious health outcome. A total of 847 SDRs were identified, based on the entire EudraVigilance database; for subgroups, the number of SDRs ranged from 84 for the age group 0–1 month to 749 for female individuals. Signals of disproportionate reporting for female individuals and male individuals were very similar. Most MEs were reported for the vaccine against human papillomavirus (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [ATC]: J07BM01; 11,086 MEs, 57% being “inappropriate schedule of product administration”), with reporting odds ratios that range from 1.5 to 47.0 among age groups. The SDR for the live-attenuated vaccine against herpes zoster (ATC: J07BK02) had a reporting odds ratio that ranged from 26.6 to 78.1 among all subgroups. Signals of disproportionate reporting for oxycodone (ATC: N02AA05; 847 cases of “Accidental overdose”, 35%), risperidone (ATC: N05AX08; 469 cases “Inappropriate schedule of product administration”, 22.3%) and rivaroxaban (ATC: B01AF01; 1,377 cases of “Incorrect dose administered”, 34.6%) stood out with higher magnitude SDRs for the age group 2 months to 2 years, with an reporting odds ratio range between 8.2 and 10.7, while for the entire EudraVigilance the reporting odds ratio ranged between 1.3 and 1.6 for the same drugs. Conclusions This exploratory research provides an overview of characterised ME individual case safety reports and SDRs from the EudraVigilance database. Most conspicuous SDRs were identified in specific age groups. Signals of disproportionate reporting, not described in the literature, were found for vaccines, oxycodone, rivaroxaban and risperidone, and may prompt further examination by stakeholders. Top-reported MEs (“Inappropriate schedule of product administration”, “Incorrect dose administered” and “Wrong technique in product usage process”) emerged as a general priority focus to perform a further root-cause analysis involving healthcare providers, manufacturers and regulatory bodies, to improve the understanding and prevention of MEs.

Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-024-01478-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:48:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01478-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/adis/journal/40264

DOI: 10.1007/s40264-024-01478-6

Access Statistics for this article

Drug Safety is currently edited by Nitin Joshi

More articles in Drug Safety from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().