Economics of evaluation (with special reference to promotion and tenure committees)
Tim Perri ()
Economics of Governance, 2018, vol. 19, issue 1, 1-19
Abstract Previous research suggests that universities that fear tenuring bad candidates more than they fear rejecting good candidates would optimally have both department and outside evaluating committees. I find that a higher relative cost of accepting bad candidates is neither necessary nor sufficient for the optimality of more than one committee. Also, with some probability, t, the administration will tenure one with split recommendations from two committees, if one committee is more accurate than the other, one structure will have fewer errors of both types for some range of t, and possibly a lower expected loss from errors for all t.
Keywords: Promotion; Tenure; Hierarchy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10101-017-0200-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ecogov:v:19:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10101-017-0200-1
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10101/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Economics of Governance is currently edited by Amihai Glazer and Marko Koethenbuerger
More articles in Economics of Governance from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().