Voting on welfare reform Stemming migration, assisting the needy, or promoting economic growth?

Dennis Coates

Economics of Governance, 2000, vol. 1, issue 3, 233-259

Abstract: This paper examines the influences on voting by members of the House of Representatives on the Carter Administration's welfare reform legislation. The analysis finds some support for the hypothesis that voting by national legislators responded to the potential mobility of welfare recipients from low to high benefit states. Defining the public interest as promoting economic growth and the special interest as increasing redistribution, the results also provide evidence in support of the Stigler hypothesis that politically secure legislators are better able to vote the public, as opposed to the special, interest. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Keywords: Key words: Welfare; reform; legislator voting; JEL classification: H0; I3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ecogov:v:1:y:2000:i:3:p:233-259

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10101/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

Economics of Governance is currently edited by Amihai Glazer and Marko Koethenbuerger

More articles in Economics of Governance from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().