When does universal peace prevail? Secession and group formation in conflict
Francis Bloch (),
Santiago Sánchez-Pagés () and
Raphael Soubeyran ()
Economics of Governance, 2006, vol. 7, issue 1, 3-29
This paper analyzes secession and group formation in the general model of contests due to Esteban and Ray (1999). This model encompasses as special cases rent seeking contests and policy conflicts, where agents lobby over the choice of a policy in a one-dimensional policy space. We show that in both models the grand coalition is the efficient coalition structure and agents are always better off in the grand coalition than in a contest among singletons. Individual agents (in the rent seeking contest) and extremists (in the policy conflict) only have an incentive to secede when they anticipate that their secession will not be followed by additional secessions. Incentives to secede are lower when agents cooperate inside groups. The grand coalition emerges as the unique subgame perfect equilibrium outcome of a sequential game of coalition formation in rent seeking contests. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2006
Keywords: Secession; group formation; rent seeking contests; policy conflicts (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (37) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ecogov:v:7:y:2006:i:1:p:3-29
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10101/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Economics of Governance is currently edited by Amihai Glazer and Marko Koethenbuerger
More articles in Economics of Governance from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().