Measuring Natural Risks in the Philippines: Socioeconomic Resilience and Wellbeing Losses

Brian Walsh () and Stephane Hallegatte
Additional contact information
Brian Walsh: Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, World Bank

Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, 2020, vol. 4, issue 2, No 1, 249-293

Abstract: Abstract Traditional risk assessments use asset losses as the main metric to measure the severity of a disaster. Here, an expanded risk assessment is proposed based on a framework that adds “socioeconomic resilience” — that is, the ability of affected households to cope with and recover from disaster asset losses — and uses “wellbeing losses” as its main measure of disaster severity. Using a new agent-based model that represents explicitly the recovery and reconstruction process at the household level, this risk assessment provides new insights into disaster risks in the Philippines. Its first conclusion is the close link between natural disasters and poverty. On average, estimates suggest that almost half a million Filipinos per year face transient consumption poverty due to natural disasters. Nationally, the bottom income quintile suffers only 9% of the total asset losses, but 31% of the total wellbeing losses. As a result of the disproportionate impact on poor people, the average annual wellbeing losses due to disasters in the Philippines is estimated at US$3.9 billion per year, more than double the asset losses of US$1.4 billion. The second conclusion is the fact that the regions identified as priorities for risk-management interventions differ depending on which risk metric is used. While cost-benefit analyses based on asset losses direct risk reduction investments toward the richest regions and areas, a focus on poverty or wellbeing rebalances the analysis and generates a different set of regional priorities. Finally, measuring disaster impacts through poverty and wellbeing impacts allows the quantification of the benefits from interventions like rapid post-disaster support and adaptive social protection. While these measures do not reduce asset losses, they efficiently reduce their wellbeing consequences by making the population more resilient.

Keywords: Natural risks; Resilience; Risk assessment; Welfare; Philippines (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41885-019-00047-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
Working Paper: Measuring Natural Risks in the Philippines: Socioeconomic Resilience and Wellbeing Losses (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ediscc:v:4:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s41885-019-00047-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... mental/journal/41885

DOI: 10.1007/s41885-019-00047-x

Access Statistics for this article

Economics of Disasters and Climate Change is currently edited by Ilan Noy and Shunsuke Managi

More articles in Economics of Disasters and Climate Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().