Unit roots, postwar slowdowns and long-run growth: Evidence from two structural breaks
Dan Ben-David (),
Robin L. Lumsdaine and
David Papell ()
Empirical Economics, 2003, vol. 28, issue 2, 303-319
This paper provides evidence on the unit root hypothesis and long-term growth by allowing for two structural breaks. We reject the unit root hypothesis for three-quarters of the countries – approximately 50% more rejections than in models that allow for only one break. While about half of the countries exhibit slowdowns following their postwar breaks, the others have grown along paths that have become steeper over the past 120 years. The majority of the countries, including most of the slowdown countries, exhibit faster growth after their second breaks than during the decades preceding their first breaks. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003
Keywords: Key words: unit root hypothesis; trend breaks; growth; JEL classification: C22; O1; O47; O5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (99) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Unit Roots, Postwar Slowdowns and Long-Run Growth: Evidence from Two Structural Breaks (1998)
Working Paper: Unit Roots Postwar Slowdowns and Long-Run Growth: Evidence from Two Structural Breaks (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:empeco:v:28:y:2003:i:2:p:303-319
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... rics/journal/181/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Empirical Economics is currently edited by Robert M. Kunst, Arthur H.O. van Soest, Bertrand Candelon, Subal C. Kumbhakar and Joakim Westerlund
More articles in Empirical Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().