The role of self-reporting bias in health, mental health and labor force participation: a descriptive analysis

Justin Leroux, John Rizzo and Robin Sickles

Empirical Economics, 2012, vol. 43, issue 2, 525-536

Abstract: Previous research on male subjects has conjectured that subjective self-reports of health status may lead to an upward bias in the estimated effect of health on labor force participation because subjects who are out of the labor force may be more likely to understate their health status so as to justify their lack of employment. In the descriptive analysis conducted in this article, we compare the effects of mental and physical health status on labor force participation, employing propensity score methods to investigate whether these effects differ for self- and proxy respondents. The authors initially find some evidence that seems to suggest systematic differences between proxy and self-reporters in the effects of health on labor force participation, raising the possibility that self-reporters may be biased in their health assessments. After we control for objective baseline indices of mental and physical health status, however, differences between subjective health assessments and labor force participation become smaller and statistically insignificant. These results suggest that self-reports do not lead to overestimates of the importance of good physical or mental health on labor force participation, after one controls for objective health conditions in the models. Although we conclude that propensity score matching is a useful way to align observations with covariates in estimating the effects of health on labor force participation, we find that the appropriate specification of matching variables—and in particular, the inclusion of objective health measures—is critical for understanding whether self-reporting bias matters in this context. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2012

Keywords: Health economics; Propensity scoring; Logistic regression; Self-reported health; Labor force participation; Mental health; C10; C14; I18; J24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00181-010-0434-z (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:empeco:v:43:y:2012:i:2:p:525-536

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... rics/journal/181/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s00181-010-0434-z

Access Statistics for this article

Empirical Economics is currently edited by Robert M. Kunst, Arthur H.O. van Soest, Bertrand Candelon, Subal C. Kumbhakar and Joakim Westerlund

More articles in Empirical Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().