A note on the robustness of Card and Krueger (1994) and Neumark and Wascher (2000)
Olli Ropponen ()
Empirical Economics, 2014, vol. 46, issue 1, 307-316
This note adds to the discussion originating from Card and Krueger (Am Econ Rev 84:772–793, 1994 ) and Neumark and Wascher (Am Econ Rev 90:1362–1396, 2000 ) by re-evaluating their results using the semiparametric difference-in-differences estimator introduced in Abadie (Rev Econ Stud 72:1–19, 2005 ). The note addresses the question of whether the differences in the original datasets can explain the differences in their conclusions. Although we observe heterogenous employment effects together with the differences in the distributions, the results show that the original findings on the overall employment effect of a minimum wage are fairly robust and just slightly changed when the differences in the distributions of the observed covariates are taken into account. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Keywords: Employment; Minimum wage; Nonlinear treatment effect models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: A Note on the Robustness of Card and Krueger (1994) and Neumark and Wascher (2000) (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:empeco:v:46:y:2014:i:1:p:307-316
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... rics/journal/181/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Empirical Economics is currently edited by Robert M. Kunst, Arthur H.O. van Soest, Bertrand Candelon, Subal C. Kumbhakar and Joakim Westerlund
More articles in Empirical Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().