World Trade Organization sanctions, implementation, and retaliation

Benjamin Liebman and Kasaundra Tomlin

Empirical Economics, 2015, vol. 48, issue 2, 715-745

Abstract: This is the first empirical paper to investigate the response of shareholders to the application of WTO-authorized trade retaliation. We compare shareholder gains stemming from illegal trade subsidies with the losses generated by subsequent WTO-authorized retaliatory measures. Results indicate that the average increase in share returns of U.S. firms receiving subsidies provided by the “Byrd Amendment” exceeded the share declines experienced by firms targeted with associated retaliatory tariffs. Our results also suggest that retaliatory threats have a smaller impact on targeted firms when there is less certainty that protection will actually be implemented. In general, we believe that the relatively subdued response toward retaliation diminished pressure on U.S. policymakers to strike down the Byrd Amendment, as was mandated by the WTO. Apathy toward retaliation along with associated delays in WTO compliance by the U.S. may reflect a potential weakness on the part of WTO-authorized retaliation in serving as an effective political counterweight to pro-antidumping forces in the U.S. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Keywords: WTO-dispute settlement; Retaliation; Antidumping policy; Welfare; Trade subsidy; F130 trade policy; International trade organizations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00181-013-0794-2 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:empeco:v:48:y:2015:i:2:p:715-745

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... rics/journal/181/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s00181-013-0794-2

Access Statistics for this article

Empirical Economics is currently edited by Robert M. Kunst, Arthur H.O. van Soest, Bertrand Candelon, Subal C. Kumbhakar and Joakim Westerlund

More articles in Empirical Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().