Food assistance programs and food insecurity: implications for Canada in light of the mixing problem
Craig Gundersen (),
Brent Kreider (),
John Pepper and
Valerie Tarasuk
Additional contact information
Craig Gundersen: University of Illinois
Valerie Tarasuk: University of Toronto
Empirical Economics, 2017, vol. 52, issue 3, No 8, 1065-1087
Abstract:
Abstract In light of concerns about high rates of food insecurity, some have suggested that it might be time for Canada to implement national food assistance programs like those provided in the US, namely the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the National School Lunch Program (NSLP). In this paper, we assess how adopting these types of assistance programs would change the food insecurity rate in Canada among households with children. Using data from the Current Population Survey (CPS), we first evaluate the causal impact of these programs on food insecurity rates in the US using the Canadian definition of food security. Following other recent evaluations of food assistance programs, we use partial identification methods to address the selection problem that arises because the decision to take up the program is not random. We then combine these estimated impacts for the US with data from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) to predict how SNAP and NSLP would impact food insecurity rates in Canada. Partial identification methods are used to address the “mixing problem” that arises if some eligible Canadian households would participate in SNAP and others would not. The strength of the conclusions depends on the strength of the identifying assumptions. Under the weakest assumptions, we cannot determine whether food insecurity rates would rise or fall. Under our strongest nonparametric assumptions, we find that food insecurity would fall by at least 16% if SNAP were implemented and 11% if NSLP were implemented.
Keywords: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; National School Lunch Program; Food insecurity; Partial identification; Mixing problem; Selection problem; Treatment effects; Nonparametric bounds (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C18 H4 I1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00181-016-1191-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:empeco:v:52:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s00181-016-1191-4
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... rics/journal/181/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s00181-016-1191-4
Access Statistics for this article
Empirical Economics is currently edited by Robert M. Kunst, Arthur H.O. van Soest, Bertrand Candelon, Subal C. Kumbhakar and Joakim Westerlund
More articles in Empirical Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().