Innovation and institutional ownership revisited: an empirical investigation with count data models
Susanne Berger (),
Herbert Stocker and
Achim Zeileis ()
Additional contact information
Susanne Berger: University of Innsbruck
Herbert Stocker: University of Innsbruck
Empirical Economics, 2017, vol. 52, issue 4, No 22, 1675-1688
Abstract:
Abstract By discriminating between a lazy manager and a career concerns hypothesis, Aghion et al. (Am Econ Rev 103(1):277–304, 2013. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.1.277 ) try to disentangle the link between innovation and institutional ownership. Citation-weighted patent counts are used as a proxy for innovation, which motivates the use of count data models. A replication in a narrow sense confirms their empirical results which are mainly based on Poisson models (i.e., with a single set of regression coefficients). However, when extending the model framework by count data hurdle models, it is shown that the two hurdle parts do not coincide—as they should under the Poisson model—but lead to different results. Nevertheless, a remarkably stable positive correlation of citation-weighted patents and institutional ownership across all model specifications can be shown.
Keywords: Innovation; Institutional ownership; Count data; Hurdle model; Replication (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C25 G32 O31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00181-016-1118-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
Working Paper: Innovation and Institutional Ownership Revisited: An Empirical Investigation with Count Data Models (2014) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:empeco:v:52:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s00181-016-1118-0
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... rics/journal/181/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s00181-016-1118-0
Access Statistics for this article
Empirical Economics is currently edited by Robert M. Kunst, Arthur H.O. van Soest, Bertrand Candelon, Subal C. Kumbhakar and Joakim Westerlund
More articles in Empirical Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().