Overconfident people are more exposed to “black swan” events: a case study of avalanche risk

Nicolao Bonini (), Stefania Pighin (), Enrico Rettore, Lucia Savadori (), Federico Schena (), Sara Tonini () and Paolo Tosi ()
Additional contact information
Nicolao Bonini: University of Trento
Stefania Pighin: University of Trento
Lucia Savadori: University of Trento
Federico Schena: University of Verona
Sara Tonini: IZA
Paolo Tosi: University of Trento

Empirical Economics, 2019, vol. 57, issue 4, No 14, 1443-1467

Abstract: Abstract Overconfidence is a well-established bias in which someone’s subjective confidence in their own judgment is systematically greater than their objective accuracy. There is abundant anecdotal evidence that overconfident people increase their exposure to risk. In this paper, we test whether overconfident backcountry skiers underestimate the probability of incurring a snow avalanche accident. An avalanche accident is a typical “black swan” event as defined by Taleb (The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable, Random House, New York, 2007) because it has a very low probability of occurring but with potentially dramatic consequences. To consider black swan events when studying overconfidence is particularly important, in light of previous findings on the role of overconfidence when feedbacks on tasks previously performed are inconclusive and infrequent. We run our test by measuring individual overconfidence using standard tools from the literature and then use a random effect logit model to measure its effect on the probability to take the ski route. We show that (1) overconfidence is widespread in our sample; (2) practitioners who are more prone to overestimate their knowledge are also more likely to take risks associated with a ski trip under the threat of avalanche danger, a result robust to a set of specification tests we perform. This suggests that overconfident people are more exposed to black swan events, by taking a risky decision that can bring about fatal consequences.

Keywords: Cognitive bias; Risky decision; Backcountry skiing; Measurement errors; Logit model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D12 D83 I12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00181-018-1489-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
Working Paper: Overconfident people are more exposed to “black swan” events: A case study of avalanche risk (2015)
Working Paper: Overconfident People Are More Exposed to "Black Swan" Events: A Case Study of Avalanche Risk (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:empeco:v:57:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s00181-018-1489-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... rics/journal/181/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s00181-018-1489-5

Access Statistics for this article

Empirical Economics is currently edited by Robert M. Kunst, Arthur H.O. van Soest, Bertrand Candelon, Subal C. Kumbhakar and Joakim Westerlund

More articles in Empirical Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().