EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluation of economic forecasts for Austria

Ines Fortin (), Sebastian P. Koch () and Klaus Weyerstrass
Additional contact information
Ines Fortin: Institute for Advanced Studies (Institut für Höhere Studien, IHS)
Sebastian P. Koch: Institute for Advanced Studies (Institut für Höhere Studien, IHS)

Empirical Economics, 2020, vol. 58, issue 1, No 6, 107-137

Abstract: Abstract In this paper, we evaluate macroeconomic forecasts for Austria and analyze the effects of external assumptions on forecast errors. We consider the growth rates of real GDP and the demand components as well as the inflation rate and the unemployment rate. The analyses are based on univariate measures like RMSE and Theil’s inequality coefficient and also on the Mahalanobis distance, a multivariate measure that takes the variances of and the correlations between the variables into account. We compare forecasts generated by the two leading Austrian economic research institutes, the Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS) and the Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO), and additionally consider the forecasts produced by the European Commission. The results indicate that there are no systematic differences between the forecasts of the two Austrian institutes, neither for the traditional measures nor for the Mahalanobis distance. Generally, forecasts become more accurate with a decreasing forecast horizon, as expected; they are unbiased for forecast horizons of less than a year considering traditional measures and for the shortest forecast horizon considering the Mahalanobis distance. Finally, we find that mistakes in external assumptions, in particular regarding EU GDP and the oil price, translate into forecast errors for GDP and inflation.

Keywords: Forecast evaluation; MAE; RMSE; Theil’s U2; Mean directional accuracy; Mahalanobis distance; External assumptions; Small open economy; Austria (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C53 E37 E66 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00181-019-01814-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:empeco:v:58:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s00181-019-01814-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... rics/journal/181/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s00181-019-01814-1

Access Statistics for this article

Empirical Economics is currently edited by Robert M. Kunst, Arthur H.O. van Soest, Bertrand Candelon, Subal C. Kumbhakar and Joakim Westerlund

More articles in Empirical Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-08
Handle: RePEc:spr:empeco:v:58:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s00181-019-01814-1