Estimating recreation benefits through joint estimation of revealed and stated preference discrete choice data

John Whitehead and Daniel K. Lew ()
Additional contact information
Daniel K. Lew: NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service

Empirical Economics, 2020, vol. 58, issue 4, No 20, 2009-2029

Abstract: Abstract We develop econometric models to estimate jointly revealed preference (RP) and stated preference (SP) models of recreational fishing behavior and preferences using survey data from the 2007 Alaska Saltwater Sportfishing Economic Survey. The RP data are from site choice survey questions, and the SP data are from a discrete choice experiment. Random utility models using only the RP data may be more likely to estimate the effect of cost on site selection well, but catch per day estimates may not reflect the benefits of the trip as perceived by anglers. The SP models may be more likely to estimate the effects of trip characteristics well, but less attention may be paid to the cost variable due to the hypothetical nature of the SP questions. The combination and joint estimation of RP and SP data seeks to exploit the contrasting strengths of both. We find that there are significant gains in econometric efficiency and differences between RP and SP willingness-to-pay estimates are mitigated by joint estimation. We compare a number of models that have appeared in the environmental economics literature with the generalized multinomial logit model. Naïve (1) scaled, (2) mixed logit, and (3) generalized multinomial logit models produced similar results to a generalized multinomial logit model that accounts for scale differences in RP and SP data. Willingness-to-pay estimates do not differ across these models but are greater than those in the mixed logit error components model that accounts for scale differences.

Keywords: Discrete choice experiment; Generalized multinomial logit model; Hypothetical bias; Revealed preference; Stated preference; Travel cost method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q22 Q26 Q51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00181-019-01646-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
Working Paper: Estimating Recreation Benefits through Joint Estimation of Revealed and Stated Preference Discrete Choice Data (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:empeco:v:58:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s00181-019-01646-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... rics/journal/181/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s00181-019-01646-z

Access Statistics for this article

Empirical Economics is currently edited by Robert M. Kunst, Arthur H.O. van Soest, Bertrand Candelon, Subal C. Kumbhakar and Joakim Westerlund

More articles in Empirical Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().