The arbitrage-free generalized Nelson–Siegel term structure model: Does a good in-sample fit imply better out-of-sample forecasts?
Wali Ullah ()
Additional contact information
Wali Ullah: Institute of Business Administration (IBA)
Empirical Economics, 2020, vol. 59, issue 3, No 9, 1243-1284
Abstract:
Abstract At the zero lower bound, the dynamic Nelson–Siegel (DNS) model and even the Svensson generalization of the model have trouble in fitting the short maturity yields and fail to grasp the characteristics of the Japanese government bonds (JGBs) yield curve. During the zero interest rate policy regime, the short end of the yield curve is flat and yields corresponding to various maturities have asymmetric movements. Therefore, closely related generalized versions of Nelson–Siegel model—with and without no-arbitrage restriction (GAFNS and GDNS)—that have two slopes and curvatures factors are considered and compared empirically in terms of in-sample fit as well as out-of-sample forecasts with the standard Nelson–Siegel model—with and without no-arbitrage restriction (AFNS and DNS). The affine-based models provide a more attractive fit of the yield curve than their counterpart DNS-based models. Both extended models are capable to restrict the estimated rates from becoming negative at the short end of the curve and distill the JGBs term structure of interest rate quite well. The affine-based extended model leads to a better in-sample fit than the simple GDNS model. In terms of out-of-sample accuracy, both non-affine models outperform the affine models at least for 1- and 6-month horizons. The out-of-sample predictability of the GDNS for the 1- and 6-month-ahead forecasts is superior to the GAFNS for all maturities, and for longer horizons, i.e., 12-month-ahead, the former is still compatible to the latter, particularly for short- and medium-term maturities.
Keywords: Term structure of interest rates; Arbitrage-free; Forecasting; Kalman filter (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C32 C51 C53 E43 G12 G17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00181-019-01710-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:empeco:v:59:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s00181-019-01710-8
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... rics/journal/181/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s00181-019-01710-8
Access Statistics for this article
Empirical Economics is currently edited by Robert M. Kunst, Arthur H.O. van Soest, Bertrand Candelon, Subal C. Kumbhakar and Joakim Westerlund
More articles in Empirical Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().