Comparing real-time uncertainty of the Hodrick-Prescott and Hamilton trend/cycle decompositions

Kristian Jönsson

Empirical Economics, 2025, vol. 69, issue 3, No 9, 1335-1361

Abstract: Abstract Methods for decomposing aggregate time series into trend and cycle components are frequently used in macroeconomics. When choosing which method to employ for this purpose, revision properties are often considered. In this article, the trend/cycle decomposition methods suggested by Hodrick and Prescott (1997) and by Hamilton (2018) are compared with respect to their revision properties at different time-series sample positions. Considering revisions for different sample positions individually, without aggregating into a summary statistic for the entire sample, can nuance results. It is shown that the filters have distinctly differing real-time revision properties that vary considerably across sample positions. While the investigated revision properties are worse for the HP filter during an initial period when more data become available, the Hamilton filter’s properties degrade slowly over time and tend to eventually become worse than those of the HP filter when more observations have become available. These nuances are not possible to trace out when investigating revision properties using methods that do not account for properties at specific sample positions. The results imply that which decomposition method is preferable in terms of real-time uncertainty depends on what profile of instability is deemed least problematic for the empirical situation under consideration. As a consequence, choosing between the two filters becomes an important trade-off with respect to the filters’ revision properties in the light of the specific task at hand and the preferences of the practitioner.

Keywords: Business Cycles; GDP Gap; HP Filter; Hamilton Filter; Real-Time Uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C15 C22 E32 E37 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00181-025-02765-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:empeco:v:69:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s00181-025-02765-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... rics/journal/181/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s00181-025-02765-6

Access Statistics for this article

Empirical Economics is currently edited by Robert M. Kunst, Arthur H.O. van Soest, Bertrand Candelon, Subal C. Kumbhakar and Joakim Westerlund

More articles in Empirical Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().