Building sustainability in the Eastern Himalaya: linking evidence to action

Sandeep Tambe (), Gopal S. Rawat (), Nima Tashi Bhutia (), Pem Norbu Sherpa (), Subash Dhakal (), Sarika Pradhan (), Himanshu Kulkarni () and M. L. Arrawatia ()
Additional contact information
Sandeep Tambe: Indian Institute of Forest Management
Gopal S. Rawat: Wildlife Institute of India
Nima Tashi Bhutia: Government of Sikkim
Pem Norbu Sherpa: Government of Sikkim
Subash Dhakal: Government of Sikkim
Sarika Pradhan: Government of Sikkim
Himanshu Kulkarni: Advanced Centre for Water Resources Development and Management

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 2020, vol. 22, issue 6, No 46, 5887-5903

Abstract: Abstract Operating at the science, policy, practice interface (SPPI) is often contentious, as knowledge creators and end-users seldom engage, preferring to operate in their own worlds. The application of science to solve sustainability challenges has not received the desired attention, especially in developing countries. How to strengthen the credibility, relevance and legitimacy of research so as to enhance the chances of uptake in decision making? How to generate knowledge differently, so that it is more likely to bring about change and benefit society? The purpose of this research is to examine these questions in the context of three sustainability case studies that were able to transcend the knowledge action barrier. These case studies are from the global biodiversity hot spot of Eastern Himalaya, India, and cover the themes of sustainability of pastoral systems, promoting sustainable livelihoods for the poor and co-designing a Himalayan spring revival initiative. The findings are structured to highlight how the demand for science arose, findings of the research and how the knowledge generated was translated into action. The results show that firstly relevance of science increases manifold when aligned to prominent policy decisions and real-world problems. Secondly, trans-disciplinary studies that synthesize social, economic and ecological aspects have a greater chance of influencing policy makers. Thirdly, mediation by science stewards holds lot of promise in connecting the worlds of academicians and policy makers. The study provides practical guidance on bridging the SPPI and contributes to the growing body of the literature on sustainability science.

Keywords: Sustainability science; Science stewards; Co-production; Synthesis; Boundary work (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-019-00456-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:endesu:v:22:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-019-00456-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10668

DOI: 10.1007/s10668-019-00456-8

Access Statistics for this article

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development is currently edited by Luc Hens

More articles in Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().