Smallholder farmers’ willingness to pay for sustainable land management practices in the Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia

Gashaw Tenna Alemu (), Atsushi Tsunekawa, Nigussie Haregeweyn, Zerihun Nigussie, Mitsuru Tsubo, Asres Elias, Zemen Ayalew, Daregot Berihun, Enyew Adgo, Derege Tsegaye Meshesha, Dessalegn Molla, Eric Ndemo Okoyo and Lemma Zemedu
Additional contact information
Gashaw Tenna Alemu: Tottori University
Atsushi Tsunekawa: Arid Land Research Center, Tottori University
Nigussie Haregeweyn: International Platform for Dryland Research and Education, Tottori University
Zerihun Nigussie: Arid Land Research Center, Tottori University
Mitsuru Tsubo: Arid Land Research Center, Tottori University
Asres Elias: Tottori University
Zemen Ayalew: Bahir Dar University
Daregot Berihun: Bahir Dar University
Enyew Adgo: Bahir Dar University
Derege Tsegaye Meshesha: Bahir Dar University
Dessalegn Molla: GIZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit) Office
Eric Ndemo Okoyo: Haramaya University
Lemma Zemedu: Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 2021, vol. 23, issue 4, No 42, 5640-5665

Abstract: Abstract Sustainable land management (SLM) practices for curbing the effects of land degradation, mainly in drought-prone areas, have been addressed by the community-based watershed development (CBWD) scheme since the 1980s in Ethiopia. However, the scheme has failed to consider farmers’ potential willingness to pay (WTP) for SLM practices, as well as basic biophysical, socioeconomic, and institutional factors. This study estimated farmers’ potential WTP (in terms of labor) and analyzed the drivers behind it in the Upper Blue Nile basin in Ethiopia. A contingent valuation method and Tobit econometric model were used to analyze survey data from 300 household heads. About 76% of the farmers said they would be willing to contribute labor (3.5–28 man-days yr−1), but the mean WTP (9.4 man-days yr−1) of the three watersheds was less than the set government value (28 man-days yr−1). The farmers’ WTP aggregate benefit at the watershed scale was estimated to be US$55,572 yr−1. The econometric model results revealed that sex, age group, farmland size, SLM-related training, and household perception of land degradation influenced farmers’ potential WTP. To this end, revising the current CBWD scheme by considering various aspects of farmers’ WTP would help to make the scheme demand-driven. Moreover, the provision of gender- and resource-disaggregated training and the introduction of economic incentives to increase the economic productivity of SLM practices would enhance farmers’ maximum WTP capacity and assure sustainable community participation.

Keywords: Drought; Land degradation; Community participation; Contingent valuation; Tobit (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-020-00835-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10668-020-00835-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10668

DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-00835-6

Access Statistics for this article

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development is currently edited by Luc Hens

More articles in Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().