How much is enough? How multi-season exposure to demonstrations affects the use of conservation farming practices in Mozambique
Dickson N. Khainga (),
Paswel P. Marenya () and
Maria Luz Quinhentos ()
Additional contact information
Dickson N. Khainga: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)
Paswel P. Marenya: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)
Maria Luz Quinhentos: Mozambique Institute of Agricultural Research, IIAM
Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 2021, vol. 23, issue 7, No 68, 11067-11089
Abstract:
Abstract Scaling new agricultural practices and technologies requires deliberate investments in the education and training of farmers. This can be done through field demonstrations, farmer field days and exchange visits. However, the effectiveness of these extension approaches has not been adequately documented, especially in quantitative terms. Based on data collected from 875 smallholder farmers in central and northern Mozambique, this paper uses a continuous treatment model within the framework of a generalized propensity score matching to empirically assess the effectiveness of community-based extension activities in fostering the adoption of a set of conservation tillage practices. The results show that controlling for socio-demographic factors such as gender of decision maker, land size and access to government services, the area under conservation tillage doubled when respondents had been exposed to targeted extension activities for at least six seasons, from a baseline exposure of two seasons. Subject to further program and investment analysis, the results suggest that farmer-centered learning activities should be implemented for about four to six seasons as a likely optimal lifespan of such programs. Our study offers an important first step in making an empirical case for multi-year investments in extension activities. For rural development programming in Mozambique and similar areas, these results suggest the need for sustained funding and personnel allocation in agricultural extension activities in local farming communities.
Keywords: Conservation agriculture; Agricultural extension; Scaling; Generalized propensity score; Dose response (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-020-01106-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s10668-020-01106-0
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10668
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-01106-0
Access Statistics for this article
Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development is currently edited by Luc Hens
More articles in Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().