Can policies aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions help mitigate haze pollution? An empirical analysis of the emissions trading system
Huachao Yang,
Ting Gan,
Wei Liang () and
Xianchun Liao
Additional contact information
Huachao Yang: University of Jinan
Ting Gan: University of Jinan
Wei Liang: University of Jinan
Xianchun Liao: Shandong Longshan Green Economic Research Center
Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 2022, vol. 24, issue 2, No 19, 1959-1980
Abstract:
Abstract Haze pollution is a major cause of serious respiratory health problems, and reducing haze has become increasingly necessary. Additionally, China is the largest carbon emitter worldwide, and the need to improve the country’s energy conservation and emission reduction strategies has become increasingly urgent. To reduce CO2 emissions, China launched an emissions trading system (ETS) pilot program in 2011. Whether this system reduces haze pollution remains unclear and is the focus of this paper. Based on data from 31 provinces and autonomous regions in Chinese mainland from 2000 to 2017, using haze pollution as the dependent variable, this paper uses the difference-in-differences (DID) and propensity score matching-difference-in-differences (PSM-DID) approaches to conduct empirical analyses of the effects of the ETS on haze pollution in pilot provinces and their neighboring provinces. The results show the following. (1) In the pilot areas, the estimated coefficient of PSM-DID is “− 6.29,” indicating that the ETS can alleviate haze pollution in the pilot areas and achieve a win–win situation of controlling haze pollution and promoting CO2 emission reduction. (2) In the provinces adjacent to the pilot areas, the estimated coefficient of PSM-DID is “− 1.98.” The ETS effectively alleviated local haze pollution, providing a “spillover effect.” (3) Although the ETS was equally effective in controlling haze pollution in the provinces surrounding the pilot areas, its impact on the particulate matter (PM2.5) concentration in the provinces surrounding the pilot areas was weaker than that in the pilot areas, and there was a certain lag period.
Keywords: Emissions trading system; DID; PSM-DID; PM2.5; Carbon emissions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01515-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01515-9
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10668
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01515-9
Access Statistics for this article
Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development is currently edited by Luc Hens
More articles in Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().