Carbon footprint of different fuels used in public transportation in Taiwan: a life cycle assessment

Ching-Chih Chang () and Po-Chien Huang ()
Additional contact information
Ching-Chih Chang: National Cheng Kung University
Po-Chien Huang: National Cheng Kung University

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 2022, vol. 24, issue 4, No 57, 5825 pages

Abstract: Abstract This research is an investigation of public transport carbon footprints using a life cycle assessment (the model of total carbon footprint as Eq. 1 on page 17) considering four different types of fuel (diesel, electric, liquefied natural gas, and hydrogen). This paper refers to ISO 14040:2006 and ISO 14067:2018 to evaluate the carbon footprints of these four different types of fuel. The bus transportation service in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, is the object, focusing on the route with the largest number of passengers. The results reveal that the hydrogen fuel cell bus emitted the least GHGs over its life cycle, with a reduction of − 67.52% compared to a diesel bus, while the electronic bus emitted − 55.13% less GHG over its life cycle, and the liquefied natural gas bus emitted − 45.81% less. These mean diesel buses and liquefied natural gas buses accounted for the most emissions in the bus service fuel phase of the carbon footprint life cycle. However, electric and hydrogen fuel cell buses do not emit GHGs in the bus service phase in terms of fuel. The phases involving the extraction and manufacturing of raw materials for both kinds of buses account for most of the life cycle emissions. In conclusion, the results of this study show that the hydrogen fuel cell bus has the greatest effects with regard to reducing GHG emissions among the three types of buses under consideration, and so, it is recommended that hydrogen fuel cell buses be widely applied in bus transportation in the future.

Keywords: Carbon footprint; Green city; Public transportation mode; Hydrogen; Life cycle assessment; ISO (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01685-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01685-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10668

DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01685-6

Access Statistics for this article

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development is currently edited by Luc Hens

More articles in Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().