EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Stackelberg game model for insurance contracts in green supply chains with government intervention involved

Saber Sayadian and Mahboobeh Honarvar ()
Additional contact information
Saber Sayadian: Yazd University
Mahboobeh Honarvar: Yazd University

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 2022, vol. 24, issue 6, No 9, 7665-7697

Abstract: Abstract There is often a noticeable lack of coordination in green supply chains induced by the conflict of goals, which weakens the chains’ performance. Ignoring this problem sometimes causes the system to fail. In such cases, governments may intervene to coordinate supply chains and reduce their pollutants. Governments themselves have large state-owned companies such as gas, oil and electricity which include many suppliers that provide the needed products. One way of coordinating green supply chains with government intervention is to use contracts. This study deals with green supply chain coordination with government intervention through mediating state-owned companies and the implementation of insurance. One of the important contributions of this paper is considering the insurance contract in coordinating the green supply chain. The defined insurance contract structure seeks to reduce the risk of apparent bankruptcy and, thus, reduce pollutants. The performance of the provided insurance contract is comparable to that of the cost-sharing contract as a commonly used tool to coordinate green supply chains with government interventions. The model used in this study is the bi-level extensive game model with the Stackelberg approach. At the first level, the employer, i.e., a state-owned company and the government, is postulated as the leader. At the second level, the suppliers are placed as followers. As the model is formulated as a mixed integer program, another contribution of the paper is developing a hybrid algorithm to solve the corresponding problem. The contracts are compared in three scenarios and four states. The results show the superiority of the insurance contract over the cost-sharing contract.

Keywords: Coordination; Green supply chain; Insurance contract; Stackelberg game (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01752-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01752-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10668

DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01752-y

Access Statistics for this article

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development is currently edited by Luc Hens

More articles in Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01752-y