EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluation of energy-saving retrofit projects of existing rural residential envelope structures from the perspective of rural residents: the Chinese case

Tongze Han, Ping Liu (), Changlin Niu and Qiangnian Li
Additional contact information
Tongze Han: Lanzhou University of Technology
Ping Liu: Lanzhou University of Technology
Changlin Niu: Lanzhou University of Technology
Qiangnian Li: Lanzhou University of Technology

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 2023, vol. 25, issue 8, No 41, 8419-8446

Abstract: Abstract The existing residential envelope in rural areas has low energy efficiency, with low energy utilization and serious energy waste for winter heating. However, in recent years, farmers have not undertaken energy efficiency retrofit projects for existing buildings in rural areas. This study proposed an evaluation model based on the logistic-AHP-TOPSIS method from the perspective of farmers. First, this study conducted a questionnaire survey of 208 rural households and used logistic models to determine which existing evaluation indicators significantly impact farmers' willingness to participate in energy efficiency retrofit projects. Second, the weights of the eight indicators were determined using AHP. Finally, this study evaluated the retrofit program of a case in Gansu Province using the TOPSIS method. In the analysis, total investment, annual winter heating costs and energy efficiency improvements were found to be the most important factors for farmers. The highest score for existing buildings was 0.3747 because there is no additional investment required; the option of partial retrofitting according to the actual needs of households scored 0.3350 because it balances economic performance with energy efficiency performance; The entire retrofit program has the highest investment and a long payback period, and its score is the lowest with 0.2904. Furthermore, the study recommended that a self-build and self-repair organization led by village collectives be developed to unify the retrofit design and construction and lower renovation costs. Bulk purchases could enable farmers to increase their power in negotiations.

Keywords: Energy-saving retrofit; Rural residential; Evaluation models; Policy recommendations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02406-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02406-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10668

DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02406-3

Access Statistics for this article

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development is currently edited by Luc Hens

More articles in Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02406-3