Data-driven reference evapotranspiration (ET0) estimation: a comparative study of regression and machine learning techniques

Jitendra Rajput (), Man Singh (), K. Lal (), Manoj Khanna (), A. Sarangi (), J. Mukherjee () and Shrawan Singh ()
Additional contact information
Jitendra Rajput: ICAR-IARI
Man Singh: ICAR-IARI
K. Lal: ICAR-IARI
Manoj Khanna: ICAR-IARI
A. Sarangi: ICAR-IARI
J. Mukherjee: ICAR-IARI
Shrawan Singh: ICAR-IARI

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 2024, vol. 26, issue 5, No 66, 12679-12706

Abstract: Abstract Precise computation of evapotranspiration is critical for an efficient irrigation planning and managing agriculture water. This investigation aimed to study the performance of regression techniques and machine learning (ML) techniques in estimating daily reference evapotranspiration (ET0) and compare them to the ET0 computed by the Penman–Monteith (PM-56) technique of “Food and Agriculture Organization” (FAO). The study used the meteorological data of the Pusa Institute, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi, which is located in a semi-arid climatic zone, for a period of 31 years (1990–2020). Six regression techniques were used, including multiple linear regression (MLR), elastic net regression (ENR), ridge regression (RDR), lasso regression (LASSOR), partial least square regression (PLSR), and Poisson regression (POR). Four machine learning models, namely radial basis function (RBF), M5Tree, locally weighted learning (LWL), and gradient boosted tree (GBT), were also evaluated for predicting daily ET0. The M5Tree model outclassed all other models in predicting daily ET0, with a mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root-mean-squared error (RMSE), R-squared (R2), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and Willmott's index (d) of 0.088, 0.018, 0.136, 0.994, 3.073%, and 0.914, respectively, in training of the models. While during testing period, M5Tree model gave MAE, MSE, RMSE, R2, MAPE and d values as 0.114, 0.16, 0.382, 0.949, 3.946% and 0.988, respectively. During training phase, the GBT model reported MAE, MSE, RMSE, R2, MAPE and d as 0.097, 0.021, 0.145, 0.993, 3.257% and 0.998, respectively, which were slightly poor than the M5Tree model. Further, the GBT model showed the best performance during model testing, with MAE, MSE, RMSE, R2, MAPE, and d of 0.126, 0.053, 0.230, 0.982, 4.166%, and 0.995, respectively. Additionally, the POR model performed the worst in predicting daily ET0 values, as evidenced by the prediction error statistics. In conclusion, the developed ET0 model may be utilized to precisely predict ET0 in semi-arid region for efficient irrigation scheduling, especially in the absence of weighing type field lysimeter.

Keywords: Reference evapotranspiration; Multiple linear regression; Elastic net regression; Gradient boosted tree; Prediction error statistics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03978-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03978-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10668

DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03978-4

Access Statistics for this article

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development is currently edited by Luc Hens

More articles in Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().