Differential carbon footprint resulting from cooking fuels: a cross-sectional study in rural and urban setup of Kalyani Region, District Nadia, West Bengal

Madhushree Dey (), Rajesh Kumar Gautam and Aribam Bijayasundari Devi
Additional contact information
Madhushree Dey: Dr. Harisingh Gour Vishwavidyalaya
Rajesh Kumar Gautam: Dr. Harisingh Gour Vishwavidyalaya
Aribam Bijayasundari Devi: Dr. Harisingh Gour Vishwavidyalaya

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 2025, vol. 27, issue 5, No 33, 10629-10653

Abstract: Abstract In the multifaceted spectrum of cooking fuel preferences, the household choices play a pivotal role in GHG emission. Hence, the present study explores the dynamics of consumption of varied cooking fuels and their corresponding carbon footprints among the Indian households. To achieve the goal, data were collected from 610 households of the Kalyani region of West Bengal using a semi-structured interview schedule. It was found that rural households emit higher CO2e (662.77 kg) annually than the urban (491.54 kg). Rural households predominantly rely on traditional-biomass (firewood/cow-dung) and transitional (kerosene) fuels while urban households use modern fuels largely, e.g. LPG and electricity. Fuel stacking behaviour was observed among the rural households. Regression analysis reveals that fuel choices and carbon footprints are impacted by a range of factors: income, standard of living, household size, education, etc. Hence, it can be inferred that cooking fuel consumption is multifactorial. To promote sustainability, future efforts should focus on the adoption of clean/green fuel, cost reduction, and raising awareness about efficient fuel use. Achieving sustainable cooking practices also requires strategies that address accessibility, affordability, poverty reduction, employment opportunities, and equitable resource access. Furthermore, harnessing solar energy for cooking/lighting may offer a promising avenue for sustainability.

Keywords: Emission; Households; Fuel stacking; Energy ladder; Multinomial regression; Traditional biomass (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-04325-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04325-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10668

DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04325-3

Access Statistics for this article

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development is currently edited by Luc Hens

More articles in Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().