Ecological engineering or nature-based solutions: does the term matter?

Jessica Oliveira Demarco (), Stacy L. Hutchinson and Trisha Moore
Additional contact information
Jessica Oliveira Demarco: Kansas State University
Stacy L. Hutchinson: Kansas State University
Trisha Moore: Kansas State University

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 2025, vol. 27, issue 7, No 6, 15173-15198

Abstract: Abstract Attempting to find the most advantageous approach to address environmentally, economically, and politically acceptable environmental challenges has led many organizations to incorporate new terms such as nature-based and ecological. The difference in orientation and terms of reference creates a gap to cross in the search for mutual understanding since the inconsistent use of terminology makes it challenging to find a specific solution. This research aims to better understand the impact of using different terms and evaluate the connections and differences among them through a bibliometric analysis. A bibliometric analysis was performed using the bibliometrix package in RStudio on environmental engineering, ecological engineering, nature-based solutions, engineering with nature, constructed wetlands, green engineering, and ecological systems. A thorough database search of Web of Science and Scopus was conducted to retrieve all published articles containing these terms from 1945 to 2021. The results showed that these terms developed over different periods, with a recent increase in the scientific literature. The growth of ecological engineering is stagnant, while green engineering and nature-based solutions are becoming more popular, with the highest average number of citations per year. The term “constructed wetlands” was chosen as part of the Ecological engineering field; however, the strongest connection is with environmental engineering. Considering the latest publications, environmental engineering remains the predominant area, with nature-based solutions gaining popularity in lieu of ecological engineering. Bridging the conceptual gap between these terms is crucial for fostering a more cohesive understanding and application of environmentally friendly solutions.

Keywords: Constructed wetlands; Ecological systems; Engineering with nature; Environmental engineering; Green engineering; Nature-based solutions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04581-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04581-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10668

DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04581-x

Access Statistics for this article

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development is currently edited by Luc Hens

More articles in Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().