Socio-anthropology of traditional wildlife exploitation mechanisms among the Turumbu people, DRC: What are the challenges for biodiversity conservation?

Charles M. Mpoyi (), Daddy D. Kipute (), Consolate K. Kaswera (), Lazare K. Tshipinda () and Alphonse M. Maindo ()
Additional contact information
Charles M. Mpoyi: Université Officielle de Mbujimayi
Daddy D. Kipute: Université Officielle de Mbujimayi
Consolate K. Kaswera: Université de Kisangani
Lazare K. Tshipinda: Université Officielle de Mbujimayi
Alphonse M. Maindo: Tropenbos RD Congo

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 2025, vol. 27, issue 7, No 35, 15949 pages

Abstract: Abstract There is no doubt about the role of wildlife in food security and maintaining ecosystem balance. The effects of formal hunting rules on wildlife remain imperfectly understood. The traditional mechanisms in some cultures offer a good opportunity to regulate the exploitation of this vital resource. By conducting a socio-anthropological study of these mechanisms among the Turumbu people, it was possible to determine the non-food motivations for wildlife exploitation and to analyse the issues at stake in customary wildlife rules and the symbolic values that underlie them. To achieve this, data was collected through surveys (involving a questionnaire and semi-structured interview) of hunters, consumers and customary authorities. The data was processed using statistical and content analyses, and explained using Weber’s comprehensive sociology. It emerged that 43 animal species are prized for political (collection of insignia of power), zootherapeutic and social regulation purposes (customary rites, (dis)enchantment, etc.) and 27 of them are prohibited from being commercially hunted to avoid undermining sacred customs. Customary rules—and the symbolic value attached to them—regulate the exploitation of wildlife. They are compatible with biodiversity conservation because they regulate both hunting and consumption of wildlife. However, these rules are not widely followed, so they do not significantly influence hunting practices (customary status of species, p-value = 0.2922886; customary closing period, p-value = 0.3875895). From a generational point of view, more old people than young people respect the ban on certain species (p-value = 0.00215), which is not the case for suspension of hunting, where the tendency to respect it is not a function of age (p-value = 0.879). This calls for a review of the alternatives to bushmeat currently on offer.

Keywords: Hunting; Symbolic value; Wildlife; Customary mechanisms; Biodiversity conservation; Turumbu; Socio-anthropology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04588-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04588-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10668

DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04588-4

Access Statistics for this article

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development is currently edited by Luc Hens

More articles in Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().