Improving the risk–risk trade-off method for use in safety project appraisal responses
Jytte Seested Nielsen,
Susan Chilton () and
Hugh Metcalf ()
Additional contact information
Susan Chilton: Newcastle University
Hugh Metcalf: Newcastle University
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2019, vol. 21, issue 1, No 4, 86 pages
Abstract:
Abstract The risk–risk trade-off method is a technique used to elicit the relative trade-off between changes in morbidity and mortality risks in stated preference surveys. The responses can be used to inform the (relative) values or weights that should be given to different accidents in cost–benefit analyses of road-safety projects that reduce the risk of death or injury. While the method has some distinct advantages over eliciting direct monetary measures of value, it is likely to suffer from similar problems that are found in other stated preference surveys, which might mitigate against its more widespread use. This study explores this issue, but shows that the estimates from a risk–risk trade-off study can be improved by employing a pre-survey learning experiment in which respondents make incentivised risky choices and also using a frame that focuses on the total risk or risks that respondents face, thereby broadening the toolkit available to measure preferences over road-safety interventions.
Keywords: Risk–risk trade-off; Stated preference (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D6 J16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10018-018-0222-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:envpol:v:21:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10018-018-0222-0
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... mental/journal/10018
DOI: 10.1007/s10018-018-0222-0
Access Statistics for this article
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies is currently edited by Ken-Ichi Akao
More articles in Environmental Economics and Policy Studies from Springer, Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().