Tradeable-permit pollution control systems with and without commitment to auditing
Hsiao-Chi Chen and
Shi-Miin Liu
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2005, vol. 7, issue 1, 15-37
Abstract:
This article analyzes and compares behaviors of a regulator and polluting firms in tradeable permit systems with and without commitment to auditing. If all firms are compliant, the equilibria under both of the schemes are the same. In contrast, if noncompliant firms exist, the equilibria under the two systems differ. The optimal permit number could affect the equilibrium auditing probability in the no-commitment case, while this impact would not appear in the commitment case. Moreover, the regulator will audit more under no commitment to auditing. The system with no commitment to auditing is less efficient than that with commitment to auditing. Copyright Springer Japan 2005
Keywords: Tradeable permit; No commitment to auditing; Commitment to auditing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF03353943 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:envpol:v:7:y:2005:i:1:p:15-37
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... mental/journal/10018
DOI: 10.1007/BF03353943
Access Statistics for this article
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies is currently edited by Ken-Ichi Akao
More articles in Environmental Economics and Policy Studies from Springer, Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().