Innovation in environmental policy: the National Environmental Policy Act of the US and the Resource Management Act of New Zealand
Sarah Michaels and
Owen J. Furuseth
Additional contact information
Sarah Michaels: Tufts University
Owen J. Furuseth: University of North Carolina
Environment Systems and Decisions, 1997, vol. 17, issue 3, 181-190
Abstract:
Abstract On enactment, both the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 1970 of the US and the Resource Management Act (RMA), 1991 of New Zealand received accolades for innovativeness. However, is such praise justified when these acts are explored through the literature on policy innovation? This paper suggests that it is. More importantly, recognizing how different attributes of innovation contribute to having a policy adopted suggests what the crafters of future environmental policies might do well to consider. It is critical to attend to the political climate in which a policy is being drafted.
Keywords: Environmental Management; Resource Management; Nature Conservation; Environmental Policy; Policy Innovation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1997
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1018520521124 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:17:y:1997:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1018520521124
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer.com/journal/10669
DOI: 10.1023/A:1018520521124
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Environment Systems and Decisions from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().