Engaging stakeholders in nano-EHS risk governance

Jacqueline A. Isaacs (), Carol Lynn Alpert, Matthew Bates, Christopher J. Bosso, Matthew J. Eckelman, Igor Linkov and William C. Walker
Additional contact information
Jacqueline A. Isaacs: Northeastern University
Carol Lynn Alpert: Museum of Science
Matthew Bates: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center
Christopher J. Bosso: Northeastern University
Matthew J. Eckelman: Northeastern University
Igor Linkov: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center
William C. Walker: Northeastern University

Environment Systems and Decisions, 2015, vol. 35, issue 1, 24-28

Abstract: Abstract We report on an unusually frank and wide-ranging discussion concerning nano-manufacturing environmental health and safety, between industry and government representatives, insurers and litigators, and experts in life cycle and risk analysis, held at the Boston meeting of the Sustainable Nanotechnology Organization in November 2014. By transitioning from a standard conference panel presentation with audience Q&A to a forum in which each of the two dozen stakeholders in the room was invited to briefly identify themselves and share their expertise and concerns, key understandings emerged along with more nuanced thinking about a broader range of factors influencing industry decision-making and investment, public perception, and government regulation. Industry representatives and advisors who had initially arrived at the session in “observer mode” spoke frankly about the dilemmas of pursuing innovative nanotechnologies with real potential for societal benefit in a climate of regulatory and legal uncertainty. This was a “conversation that has never happened before,” noted one experienced participant, and it left many others hopeful that future stakeholder forums could accelerate the quest to achieve reasonable frameworks for safe governance of emerging technologies.

Keywords: Nanotechnology; Stakeholder engagement; Alternatives assessment; Life cycle assessment; Risk; Nano-governance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-015-9542-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:35:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s10669-015-9542-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer.com/journal/10669

DOI: 10.1007/s10669-015-9542-9

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment Systems and Decisions from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().