Stakeholder perspectives on the value proposition of enterprise-level natural capital accounting for three primary industries

E. Ingrid Putten (), Elizabeth Pinkard, Anthony O’Grady, Rebecca K. Schmidt, Ian Cresswell, Vincent Raoult and Matt D. Taylor
Additional contact information
E. Ingrid Putten: CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere
Elizabeth Pinkard: CSIRO Land and Water
Anthony O’Grady: CSIRO Land and Water
Rebecca K. Schmidt: CSIRO Land and Water
Ian Cresswell: University of Newcastle
Vincent Raoult: University of Newcastle
Matt D. Taylor: Port Stephens Fisheries Institute

Environment Systems and Decisions, 2021, vol. 41, issue 4, 541-555

Abstract: Abstract Globally we are experiencing a decline in aggregate natural capital. Many primary industries and enterprises are highly dependent on renewable and non-renewable natural capital, but there has been little focus on measuring and monitoring the flows benefits from natural capital. Natural capital accounting can help by potentially enabling the enterprise to better adapt and respond to risks in the future. To assist future implementation of natural capital accounting we assess the value proposition perceived by primary industry stakeholders. We use three primary industries in Australia as case studies (cotton, forestry and fisheries), and surveyed 140 stakeholders across the three industries. Interviewees generally suggested natural capital accounting is of public benefit by improving environmental outcomes. Private benefits are obtained through industry gaining social licence, greater market access and better business models. Although there was general agreement over improved environmental outcomes and access to premium markets, there were differences between industries and stakeholders. There were some concerns across the industries about the potential costs natural capital accounting may add to normal business operations and the lack of consistency in practices. Mainstreaming natural capital accounting across primary industries will mean that the value propositions and the implementation barriers need to be addressed. Overall the value proposition of implementing natural capital accounts at the enterprise level must stack up favourably against its costs.

Keywords: Natural resources; Natural capital; Ecosystem service; Stakeholder perceptions; Value proposition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-021-09817-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:41:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10669-021-09817-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer.com/journal/10669

DOI: 10.1007/s10669-021-09817-z

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment Systems and Decisions from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().