EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparison of the preference-based EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD)

Fan Yang, Titus Lau, Evan Lee, A. Vathsala, Kee Chia and Nan Luo ()

The European Journal of Health Economics, 2015, vol. 16, issue 9, 1019-1026

Abstract: Both EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D are valid instruments for assessing ESRD patients. However, the two preference-based measures cannot be used interchangeably and it appears that EQ-5D-5L would lead to more favorable cost-effectiveness results than SF-6D if they are used in economic evaluations of interventions for ESRD. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Keywords: ESRD; Discriminative ability; EQ-5D-5L; SF-6D; I140 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10198-014-0664-7 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:16:y:2015:i:9:p:1019-1026

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10198/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10198-014-0664-7

Access Statistics for this article

The European Journal of Health Economics is currently edited by J.-M.G.v.d. Schulenburg

More articles in The European Journal of Health Economics from Springer, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:16:y:2015:i:9:p:1019-1026