The Amsterdam Wrist Rules: how much money can they save?

Marjolein A. M. Mulders (), Monique M. J. Walenkamp, Nico L. Sosef, Frank Ouwehand, Romuald van Velde, J. Carel Goslings and Niels W. L. Schep
Additional contact information
Marjolein A. M. Mulders: University of Amsterdam
Monique M. J. Walenkamp: University of Amsterdam
Nico L. Sosef: Spaarne Gasthuis
Frank Ouwehand: University of Amsterdam
Romuald van Velde: Tergooi Hospitals
J. Carel Goslings: Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Niels W. L. Schep: Maasstad Hospital

The European Journal of Health Economics, 2020, vol. 21, issue 5, No 7, 745-750

Abstract: Abstract Purpose To allow physicians to be more selective in their request for a radiograph of the wrist and to potentially reduce costs, the Amsterdam Wrist Rules (AWR) have been developed, externally validated, and recently also implemented. The aim of this study was to conduct an incremental cost analysis and budget impact analysis of the implementation of the AWR at the emergency department (ED) in the Netherlands. Methods A cost-minimisation analysis to determine the expected cost savings for implementation of the Amsterdam Wrist Rules. The incremental difference in costs before and after implementation of the AWR was based on the reduction in costs for radiographs, the cost savings due to reduction of ED consultation times and the costs of a re-evaluation appointment by a physician. Results In the Netherlands, implementation of the AWR could potentially result in 6% cost savings per patient with a wrist injury. In addition, implementation of the AWR resulted in €203,510 cost savings annually nationwide. In the sensitivity analysis, an increase in physician compliance to 100% substantially increased the potential total amount of annual cost savings to €610,248, which is 6% of total costs before implementation. Variation in time spent at the ED, a decrease and increase in costs and patients presenting annually at the ED did not change the cost savings substantially. Conclusion Implementation of the AWR has been shown to reduce direct and indirect costs and can, therefore, result in considerable savings of healthcare consumption and expenditure.

Keywords: Distal radius; Fracture; Trauma; Decision rule; Radiograph; Cost analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-020-01168-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:21:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s10198-020-01168-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10198/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10198-020-01168-x

Access Statistics for this article

The European Journal of Health Economics is currently edited by J.-M.G.v.d. Schulenburg

More articles in The European Journal of Health Economics from Springer, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().