EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Modelling decay in effectiveness for evaluation of behaviour change interventions: a tutorial for public health economists

Paolo Candio (), Koen B. Pouwels, David Meads, Andrew J. Hill, Laura Bojke and Claire Williams
Additional contact information
Paolo Candio: University of Birmingham
Koen B. Pouwels: University of Oxford
David Meads: Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds
Andrew J. Hill: Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds
Laura Bojke: University of York
Claire Williams: University of Oxford

The European Journal of Health Economics, 2022, vol. 23, issue 7, No 5, 1157 pages

Abstract: Abstract Background and purpose Recent methodological reviews of evaluations of behaviour change interventions in public health have highlighted that the decay in effectiveness over time has been mostly overlooked, potentially leading to suboptimal decision-making. While, in principle, discrete-time Markov chains—the most commonly used modelling approach—can be adapted to account for decay in effectiveness, this framework inherently lends itself to strong model simplifications. The application of formal and more appropriate modelling approaches has been supported, but limited progress has been made to date. The purpose of this paper is to encourage this shift by offering a practical guide on how to model decay in effectiveness using a continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC)-based approach. Methods A CTMC approach is demonstrated, with a contextualized tutorial being presented to facilitate learning and uptake. A worked example based on the stylized case study in physical activity promotion is illustrated with accompanying R code. Discussion The proposed framework presents a relatively small incremental change from the current modelling practice. CTMC represents a technical solution which, in absence of relevant data, allows for formally testing the sensitivity of results to assumptions regarding the long-term sustainability of intervention effects and improving model transparency. Conclusions The use of CTMC should be considered in evaluations where decay in effectiveness is likely to be a key factor to consider. This would enable more robust model-based evaluations of population-level programmes to promote behaviour change and reduce the uncertainty surrounding the decision to invest in these public health interventions.

Keywords: Effect decay; Mathematical modelling; Public health; Decision-making; Structural uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C6 D04 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-021-01417-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:23:y:2022:i:7:d:10.1007_s10198-021-01417-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10198/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01417-7

Access Statistics for this article

The European Journal of Health Economics is currently edited by J.-M.G.v.d. Schulenburg

More articles in The European Journal of Health Economics from Springer, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:23:y:2022:i:7:d:10.1007_s10198-021-01417-7