Comparing GPs according to their model of practice: are multiprofessional group practices associated with more favourable working conditions?

Myriam Biais (), Matthieu Cassou () and Carine Franc ()
Additional contact information
Myriam Biais: CESP, Inserm UMR 1018, Team Primary Care and Prevention
Matthieu Cassou: Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics (IRDES)
Carine Franc: CESP, Inserm UMR 1018, Team Primary Care and Prevention

The European Journal of Health Economics, 2024, vol. 25, issue 9, No 12, 1625-1640

Abstract: Abstract In the generalized context of general practitioner shortages and transitions towards team-based primary care, we investigated how the different practising models relate to general practitioners’ labour supply. More precisely, we analysed the association between practice models—solo, groups of general practitioners, and multiprofessional groups—and their reported labour supply and level of satisfaction with work-life balance. We used a French cross-sectional survey from 2018 that surveyed a representative national sample of 3,032 self-employed general practitioners about their working conditions. We found that the model of practice was significantly associated with differences in physician labour supply at the intensive margin and that group practice appeared to be positively associated with general practitioners’ reported satisfaction with work-life balance. In terms of weekly working time, only practice in groups of general practitioners was associated with a significantly lower labour supply. However, general practitioners in groups–whether groups of general practitioners or multiprofessional groups–reported more annual leave and seemed more willing to diversify their activity by devoting more time to secondary activities, including salaried activities. Consistently, general practitioners working in groups were also more likely than solo practitioners to report being satisfied with their work-life balance. Although group practice, whether multiprofessionnal or not, seems to be well suited to meeting the new aspirations of general practitioners, those working in multiprofessional groups are associated with a higher level of weekly work supply, which might justify special attention from the public authorities.

Keywords: Labour supply; Working conditions; Group practice; General practitioners; France (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I1 J22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-024-01687-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:25:y:2024:i:9:d:10.1007_s10198-024-01687-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10198/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10198-024-01687-x

Access Statistics for this article

The European Journal of Health Economics is currently edited by J.-M.G.v.d. Schulenburg

More articles in The European Journal of Health Economics from Springer, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().