Is episodic future thinking effective in mitigating the influence of time preference in time trade-off?

Zhongyu Lang (), Liying Zhang, Stefan A. Lipman, Bradley Sugden, Kim Rand and Arthur E. Attema
Additional contact information
Zhongyu Lang: Erasmus University
Liying Zhang: Erasmus University
Stefan A. Lipman: Erasmus University
Bradley Sugden: Maastricht University Medical Centre
Kim Rand: Akershus University Hospital
Arthur E. Attema: Erasmus University

The European Journal of Health Economics, 2025, vol. 26, issue 9, No 12, 1683-1704

Abstract: Abstract Objectives The composite time trade-off (cTTO) method has been found to be influenced by time preferences for future life years, which typically results in a downward bias on cTTO utilities without adjustment. Contrary to prior research that adjusted for this distortion ex-post, this study takes an ex-ante approach, using Episodic Future Thinking (EFT), to potentially prevent time preference distortion. We aim to investigate the effect of EFT on time preference and cTTO utilities compared to using alternative methods. Methods A total of 150 participants from the UK general public were recruited for interviewer-led online interviews and randomly assigned to either the control or treatment group. In the control group, they were asked to recall recent memories using the Episodic Recent Thinking (ERT) protocol, serving as filler tasks; in the treatment group, they were asked to imagine life in the next 10 to 20 years, i.e. using an EFT protocol. Afterwards, respondents were asked to value seven EQ-5D-5L health states with cTTO tasks, followed by a nonparametric method to measure time preference. Results We observed a similar pattern of time preference across the two groups, with the majority discounting positively. EFT did not significantly affect time preference. In addition, the difference between cTTO utilities mitigated by EFT and those adjusted using the ex-post approach for time preference is minimal. Conclusions In conclusion, EFT does not seem to mitigate time preference for life years and has negligible effect on cTTO utilities, necessitating alternative strategies for reducing bias in health utilities.

Keywords: EQ-5D-5L; Time preference; Time trade-off; Discounting; QALYs; Episodic future thinking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-025-01812-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:26:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s10198-025-01812-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10198/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10198-025-01812-4

Access Statistics for this article

The European Journal of Health Economics is currently edited by J.-M.G.v.d. Schulenburg

More articles in The European Journal of Health Economics from Springer, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().