Does use of long-term care differ between occupational classes among the oldest old? Vitality 90 + Study

Linda Enroth (), Mari Aaltonen, Jani Raitanen, Lily Nosraty and Marja Jylhä
Additional contact information
Linda Enroth: University of Tampere
Mari Aaltonen: University of Tampere
Jani Raitanen: University of Tampere
Lily Nosraty: University of Tampere
Marja Jylhä: University of Tampere

European Journal of Ageing, 2018, vol. 15, issue 2, No 4, 143-153

Abstract: Abstract Long-term care (LTC) use increases with ageing due to an age-related increase in disability. Both the levels of disability and social resources vary among socioeconomic groups. The association of socioeconomic status with LTC use is largely unexplored for the oldest old. This study examined how occupational class is associated with LTC use among nonagenarians in the context of universal care coverage. A population-based prospective cohort study with 2862 participants who answered the Vitality 90 + Study surveys in 2001, 2003, 2007, or 2010 in Tampere, Finland, was combined with national register data on LTC use. LTC use in total and separately for publicly and privately provided LTC facilities was assessed in a cross-sectional setting and during the 34-month follow-up by using logistic regression and competing-risks regression methods. Functional status, multimorbidity, family relations, and help at home were controlled. In total or public LTC use, only a few differences between occupational classes were found at baseline. However, upper non-manuals used more private LTC than lower non-manuals (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35–0.85), skilled manuals (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.26–0.62), or housewives (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.22–0.74). There were no statistically significant differences in entering any kind of LTC after adjustments for all independent variables. During the study period, the share of privately provided care out of all LTC increased and the upper non-manuals no more used private care more than other groups. This study underlines the importance of following the structural changes in LTC provision to guarantee that the need for LTC is met equally for all socioeconomic groups.

Keywords: Socioeconomic factors; Institutionalisation; Oldest old; Mortality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10433-017-0445-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:15:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10433-017-0445-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... iences/journal/10433

DOI: 10.1007/s10433-017-0445-0

Access Statistics for this article

European Journal of Ageing is currently edited by Marja Aartsen, Susanne Iwarsson and Prof. Dr. Matthias Kliegel

More articles in European Journal of Ageing from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().