Individual vitality changes over 20 years among aging adults, using predefined and data-driven patterns: the Doetinchem Cohort Study

Sanne G. Celant (), H. Susan J. Picavet, Anne-Marie Buisman, M. Liset Rietman and W. M. Monique Verschuren
Additional contact information
Sanne G. Celant: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment
H. Susan J. Picavet: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment
Anne-Marie Buisman: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment
M. Liset Rietman: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment
W. M. Monique Verschuren: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment

European Journal of Ageing, 2025, vol. 22, issue 1, No 42, 13 pages

Abstract: Abstract ‘Vitality’ refers to healthy aging beyond medical measures, but long-term data on vitality is scarce. Hence, we examined individual vitality patterns over 20 years, and their lifestyle and health characteristics, using predefined and data-driven methods. We used data of 3,013 adults aged 26–70 at their first vitality measurement from the Doetinchem Cohort Study examined up to 5 times from 1995 to 2019 at 5-year intervals. Vitality was based on the SF-36 vitality scale, with scores > 50 indicating good vitality. Long-term vitality patterns were defined by two approaches, predefined and data-driven, and compared using cross-tabulation and Cramér’s V. The predefined patterns were: persistent good, persistent poor, worsening, improving, and varying vitality. The lifestyle and health characteristics related to these patterns were identified by multivariate multinomial logistic regression, using persistent good vitality as the reference at both baseline (t1) and 20-year follow-up (t5). Data-driven analysis revealed patterns similar to the predefined method with varying vitality split in two variants. There was fair agreement between the approaches (Cramér’s V: 0.49). Most participants exhibited persistent good vitality: 61% in the predefined, and 78% in the data-driven approach. Compared to the persistent good vitality group, others were characterized by younger age and poor health, including pain, chronic conditions, and particularly high prevalence of poor mental health. Sex, education, household and work status, along with lifestyle factors, played a role in only some patterns. Most adults showed persistent good vitality over 20 years, with good mental health as a key characteristic of long-term vitality.

Keywords: Longitudinal; Trajectories; Lifestyle; Health; Epidemiology; Vitality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10433-025-00878-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:22:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10433-025-00878-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... iences/journal/10433

DOI: 10.1007/s10433-025-00878-6

Access Statistics for this article

European Journal of Ageing is currently edited by Marja Aartsen, Susanne Iwarsson and Prof. Dr. Matthias Kliegel

More articles in European Journal of Ageing from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().