Economics at your fingertips  

More-or-less elicitation (MOLE): reducing bias in range estimation and forecasting

Matthew B. Welsh () and Steve H. Begg
Additional contact information
Matthew B. Welsh: University of Adelaide
Steve H. Begg: University of Adelaide

EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 2018, vol. 6, issue 1, 171-212

Abstract: Abstract Biases like overconfidence and anchoring affect values elicited from people in predictable ways—due to people’s inherent cognitive processes. The more-or-less elicitation (MOLE) process takes insights from how biases affect people’s decisions to design an elicitation process to mitigate or eliminate bias. MOLE relies on four, key insights: (1) uncertainty regarding the location of estimates means people can be unwilling to exclude values they would not specifically include; (2) repeated estimates can be averaged to produce a better, final estimate; (3) people are better at relative than absolute judgements; and, (4) consideration of multiple values prevents anchoring on a particular number. MOLE achieves these by having people repeatedly choose between options presented to them by the computerized tool rather than making estimates directly, and constructing a range logically consistent with (i.e., not ruled out by) the person’s choices in the background. Herein, MOLE is compared, across four experiments, with eight elicitation processes—all requiring direct estimation of values—and is shown to greatly reduce overconfidence in estimated ranges and to generate best guesses that are more accurate than directly estimated equivalents. This is demonstrated across three domains—in perceptual and epistemic uncertainty and in a forecasting task.

Keywords: Bias; Elicitation; Forecasting; Overconfidence; Range estimation; Anchoring; 91C99 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... search/journal/40070

Access Statistics for this article

EURO Journal on Decision Processes is currently edited by Vincent Mousseau

More articles in EURO Journal on Decision Processes from Springer, EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().

Page updated 2019-11-06
Handle: RePEc:spr:eurjdp:v:6:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s40070-018-0084-5