On proper scoring rules and cumulative prospect theory
Arthur Carvalho (),
Stanko Dimitrov () and
Kate Larson ()
Additional contact information
Arthur Carvalho: Miami University
Stanko Dimitrov: University of Waterloo
Kate Larson: University of Waterloo
EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 2018, vol. 6, issue 3, No 6, 343-376
Abstract Scoring rules are traditional techniques to measure the association between a reported belief and an observed outcome. The condition that a scoring rule is proper means that an agent maximizes his expected score when he reports a belief that equals his true belief. The implicit assumption that the agent is risk neutral is, however, often unrealistic, at least when the underlying agent is a human. Modern decision theories based on rank-dependent utilities, such as cumulative prospect theory, have been shown to be more effective at describing how human beings make decisions under risk and uncertainty. Traditional proper scoring rules are, however, incompatible with cumulative prospect theory because they fail to satisfy a property called comonotonicity. In this paper, we provide novel insights on why comonotonicity is crucial to make proper scoring rules indeed proper when eliciting beliefs from cumulative prospect theory agents. After suggesting strategies to create comonotonic proper scoring rules, we propose calibration procedures to obtain an agent’s true belief by removing the influence of the agent’s value function and weighting functions from his reported belief, when beliefs are elicited by means of comonotonic proper scoring rules.
Keywords: Proper scoring rules; Cumulative prospect theory; Comonotonicity; 62C99 (Decision theory - None of the above; but in this section) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40070-018-0081-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eurjdp:v:6:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s40070-018-0081-8
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... search/journal/40070
Access Statistics for this article
EURO Journal on Decision Processes is currently edited by Vincent Mousseau
More articles in EURO Journal on Decision Processes from Springer, EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().