Sterilization network design

Ahmed Saif () and Samir Elhedhli ()
Additional contact information
Ahmed Saif: Dalhousie University
Samir Elhedhli: University of Waterloo

EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 2019, vol. 8, issue 1, No 4, 115 pages

Abstract: Abstract With the increasing costs of health care, service providers are looking for innovative ways to cut cost without sacrificing high service quality. Resource pooling is a promising trend in different health care areas, and sterilization is no exception. Specialized medical sterilization centers (SCs) that offer reusable medical device (RMD) sterilization services for hospitals have the potential to cut cost and improve efficiency through better utilization of resources, risk-pooling and economies of scale. However, it is unclear whether the resulting cost savings can offset the additional transportation costs and the operational complications associated with a centralized system. We compare three schemes to organize RMD sterilization in a group of hospitals: fully distributed, centralized processing, and centralized processing and stock keeping. The sterilization network design problem is formulated as a mixed-integer concave minimization program (MISOCP) that considers economies of scale, service level requirements and variable demand, with the objective of minimizing capacity, transportation, and inventory holding costs. The mathematical model is reformulated as a mixed-integer second-order cone program with a piecewise-linear cost function so it can be solved efficiently. We also consider the case when the first two moments of the RMD demand distributions are not known with certainty but are rather estimated based on sample data. We show that, with proper selection of the uncertainty structure, the robust nonlinear optimization problem can be tractably reformulated as a MISOCP as well. Testing on a realistic case study under different scenarios reveals that significant cost savings can be achieved by consolidating sterilization services. Compared to the distributed scheme, we found that cost saving in the second scheme is attributed primarily to improved resource utilization and economies of scale. Risk-pooling in the last scheme results in an additional small cost saving that has to be weighed against other operational and legal considerations.

Keywords: Healthcare operations; Network design; Second-order cone programming; Piecewise linearization; Robust optimization; 90B80; 90C26; 90C90 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13676-018-0118-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eurjtl:v:8:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s13676-018-0118-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... search/journal/13676

DOI: 10.1007/s13676-018-0118-y

Access Statistics for this article

EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics is currently edited by Michel Bierlaire

More articles in EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics from Springer, EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().