Real and imaginary energy gaps: a comparison between single excitation Superradiance and Superconductivity and robustness to disorder

Nahum C. Chávez, Francesco Mattiotti, J. A. Méndez-Bermúdez, Fausto Borgonovi () and G. Luca Celardo
Additional contact information
Nahum C. Chávez: Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Apartado Postal J-48, Instituto de Física
Francesco Mattiotti: Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica and Interdisciplinary Laboratories for Advanced Materials Physics, Università Cattolica
J. A. Méndez-Bermúdez: Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Apartado Postal J-48, Instituto de Física
Fausto Borgonovi: Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica and Interdisciplinary Laboratories for Advanced Materials Physics, Università Cattolica
G. Luca Celardo: Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Apartado Postal J-48, Instituto de Física

The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 2019, vol. 92, issue 7, 1-12

Abstract: Abstract A comparison between the single particle spectrum of the discrete Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) model, used for small superconducting grains, and the spectrum of a paradigmatic model of Single Excitation Superradiance (SES) is presented. They are both characterized by an equally spaced energy spectrum (Picket Fence) where all the levels are coupled between each other by a constant coupling which is real for the BCS model and purely imaginary for the SES model. While the former corresponds to the discrete BCS-model describing the coupling of Cooper pairs in momentum space and it induces a Superconductive regime, the latter describes the coupling of single particle energy levels to a common decay channel and it induces a Superradiant transition. We show that the transition to a Superradiant regime can be connected to the emergence of an imaginary energy gap, similarly to the transition to a Superconductive regime where a real energy gap emerges. Despite their different physical origin, it is possible to show that both the Superradiant and the Superconducting gaps have the same magnitude in the large gap limit. Nevertheless, some differences appear: while the critical coupling at which the Superradiant gap appears is independent of the system size N, for the Superconductivity gap it scales as (ln N)−1, which is the expected BCS result. The presence of a gap in the imaginary energy axis between the Superradiant and the Subradiant states shares many similarities with the “standard” gap on the real energy axis: the superradiant state is protected against disorder from the imaginary gap as well as the superconducting ground state is protected by the real energy gap. Moreover we connect the origin of the gapped phase to the long-range nature of the coupling between the energy levels. Graphical abstract

Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1140/epjb/e2019-100016-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:92:y:2019:i:7:d:10.1140_epjb_e2019-100016-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10051

DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2019-100016-3

Access Statistics for this article

The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems is currently edited by P. Hänggi and Angel Rubio

More articles in The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems from Springer, EDP Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().