A Comparative Study of Segregation Patterns in Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden: Neighbourhood Concentration and Representation of Non-European Migrants
Eva K. Andersson (),
Marcin Jan Stonawski and
Helga A. G. Valk
Additional contact information
Eva K. Andersson: Stockholm University
Bo Malmberg: Stockholm University
Rafael Costa: Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Bart Sleutjes: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI)/KNAW/University of Groningen
Marcin Jan Stonawski: University of Oslo
Helga A. G. Valk: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI)/KNAW/University of Groningen
European Journal of Population, 2018, vol. 34, issue 2, 251-275
Abstract In this paper, we use geo-coded, individual-level register data on four European countries to compute comparative measures of segregation that are independent of existing geographical sub-divisions. The focus is on non-European migrants, for whom aggregates of egocentric neighbourhoods (with different population counts) are used to assess small-scale, medium-scale, and large-scale segregation patterns. At the smallest scale level, corresponding to neighbourhoods with 200 persons, patterns of over- and under-representation are strikingly similar. At larger-scale levels, Belgium stands out as having relatively strong over- and under-representation. More than 55% of the Belgian population lives in large-scale neighbourhoods with moderate under- or over-representation of non-European migrants. In the other countries, the corresponding figures are between 30 and 40%. Possible explanations for the variation across countries are differences in housing policies and refugee placement policies. Sweden has the largest and Denmark the smallest non-European migrant population, in relative terms. Thus, in both migrant-dense and native-born-dense areas, Swedish neighbourhoods have a higher concentration and Denmark a lower concentration of non-European migrants than the other countries. For large-scale, migrant-dense neighbourhoods, however, levels of concentration are similar in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Sweden. Thus, to the extent that such concentrations contribute to spatial inequalities, these countries are facing similar policy challenges.
Keywords: Segregation; Comparison; Non-European immigrants; Concentration; Representation; Belgium; Denmark; The Netherlands; Sweden (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10680-018-9481-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eurpop:v:34:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10680-018-9481-5
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
European Journal of Population is currently edited by Helga A.G. de Valk
More articles in European Journal of Population from Springer, European Association for Population Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().