EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Complex derivatives valuation: applying the Least-Squares Monte Carlo Simulation Method with several polynomial basis

Ursula Silveira Monteiro de Lima () and Carlos Patricio Samanez ()
Additional contact information
Ursula Silveira Monteiro de Lima: Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro
Carlos Patricio Samanez: Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro

Financial Innovation, 2016, vol. 2, issue 1, 1-14

Abstract: Abstract Background This article investigates the Least-Squares Monte Carlo Method by using different polynomial basis in American Asian Options pricing. The standard approach in the option pricing literature is to choose the basis arbitrarily. By comparing four different polynomial basis we show that the choice of basis interferes in the option's price. Methods We assess Least-Squares Method performance in pricing four different American Asian Options by using four polynomial basis: Power, Laguerre, Legendre and Hermite A. To every American Asian Option priced, three sets of parameters are used in order to evaluate it properly. Results We show that the choice of the basis interferes in the option's price by showing that one of them converges to the option's value faster than any other by using fewer simulated paths. In the case of an Amerasian call option, for example, we find that the preferable polynomial basis is Hermite A. For an Amerasian put option, the Power polynomial basis is recommended. Such empirical outcome is theoretically unpredictable, since in principle all basis can be indistinctly used when pricing the derivative. Conclusion In this article The Least-Squares Monte Carlo Method performance is assessed in pricing four different types of American Asian Options by using four different polynomial basis through three different sets of parameters. Our results suggest that one polynomial basis is best suited to perform the method when pricing an American Asian option. Theoretically all basis can be indistinctly used when pricing the derivative. However, our results does not confirm these. We find that when pricing an American Asian put option, Power A is better than the other basis we have studied here whereas when pricing an American Asian call, Hermite A is better.

Keywords: Complex derivatives valuation; Least-Squares Monte Carlo Method; Amerasian options; Polynomial basis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40854-015-0019-0 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:fininn:v:2:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1186_s40854-015-0019-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... nomics/journal/40589

DOI: 10.1186/s40854-015-0019-0

Access Statistics for this article

Financial Innovation is currently edited by J. Leon Zhao and Zongyi

More articles in Financial Innovation from Springer, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:fininn:v:2:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1186_s40854-015-0019-0